Compliance costs in wealth management have reached a tipping point, squeezing margins and slowing firms at a moment when economic uncertainty and shifting client demographics already make growth difficult. It has become one of the most urgent issues for leadership today: a daily operational burden that eats into margins, delays onboarding and holds back growth ambitions.
The numbers make the scale clear. According to a 2024 survey by EY, only 7% of firms manage to onboard a new client in under a month. Nearly 80% still rely on manual or partially automated processes, with KYC and AML checks alone consuming around 20% of the total onboarding time.
For COOs in the wealth sector, those statistics translate into longer time-to-revenue, inflated operational costs and constant pressure on compliance teams.
When compliance inefficiencies hold back growth, leaders cannot afford to treat them as a secondary concern. They need strategies that reduce cost and complexity without adding new risks.
Rising Demands, Rising Costs
Wealth managers operate in one of the most tightly regulated parts of financial services. MiFID II across Europe, FinSA in Switzerland and the UK’s Consumer Duty all set demanding expectations for transparency, suitability and reporting. And across the EU, the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) has added new requirements for IT governance, cyber resilience and oversight of third-party providers.
Each new rule introduces more tasks to monitor, more audit trails and more data to manage. As an example, one update to reporting templates by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) in the UK introduced over 80 new data field requirements for compliant firms.
Larger institutions may be able to spread compliance costs across bigger teams, but smaller and mid-sized wealth managers, family offices and independent asset managers must absorb the same requirements with fewer people. For many, it has become difficult to manage without rethinking the approach.
'Business as Usual’ is Not Enough
Faced with new regulation, many firms simply add more people. But this quickly becomes a cost spiral. Salaries and training rise year after year while compliance teams are left managing complex processes with outdated systems.
Training itself is a hidden cost. Each regulatory update requires updated processes and retraining, and with staff turnover the cycle repeats, wasting . Valuable time is spent teaching employees how to navigate fragmented systems instead of focusing on clients or strategy.
Legacy tech stacks add to the burden. Many were not designed for today’s regulatory environment and lack automation. Instead of streamlining compliance, they create silos of data and require manual workarounds that add complexity. And with each new rule, the problem grows bigger.
The result is higher costs, longer onboarding and greater risk of human error. And the consequences of non-compliance are severe. Analysis by Fintech Global shows the financial impact of non-compliance is around 2.7 times greater than the cost of maintaining a robust compliance programme. For COOs, the message is clear: doing nothing is far more expensive than investing in better systems.
The COO’s Path to Compliance Efficiency
Targeted Support is more than a regulatory adjustment. It is the FCA’s way of giving you a growth lever. For too long, advisers have had to choose between offering only generic guidance or shouldering the full burden of regulated advice. Targeted Support creates a middle ground: lighter-touch, group-based recommendations that let you engage people you would normally have to leave on the sidelines.
Conclusion: Turning Compliance into an Efficiency Driver
Compliance costs are not going away. Regulators will continue to raise expectations and clients will continue to demand faster onboarding and transparent reporting. But COOs do not have to accept compliance as a permanent roadblock.
By embedding regulatory checks into workflows, automating AML and reporting, and leveraging cloud-ready PMS platforms, compliance becomes part of a more efficient and scalable operating model. The costs of compliance may rise, but the costs of non-compliance rise faster.
For COOs of wealth managers, family offices, and IAMs, the choice is stark. Keep struggling with manual systems and rising overhead, or turn compliance into a driver of efficiency and resilience.
You’ve seen how compliance costs are rising. But the real question is: how are other COOs managing to stay ahead? Discover what they’re doing differently.